Wireless Networking:
This tended to “just work” more than in XP. Specifically, the wireless networking is much better at self-diagnosing issues and either suggesting fixes or repairing connectivity issues automatically.
Power Management:
Another area of improvement over XP, I found it much easier to change power management schemes in Vista than XP. Performance of waking up from hibernate / suspend modes were also quite good, and obviously the power saving under hibernate mode is excellent.
Aero:
Although I was not a fan of how Aero killed system resources, I did like the eyecandy Vista brings to the table (still behind OSX though). The default Aero theme is pretty clean, although a little dark for my tastes. One gripe: Why can’t I change the color of the app bar from black? Why do maximized windows go to a black border even when they are set to be white otherwise?
No “oh where is my XP cd?”:
In XP, you often need to go back to the install CD to install things like less used drivers, and other features. This is a big pain in the ass for unorganized people that haven’t touched their XP cd in a couple of years and it happens to be sitting under a huge pile of garbage in some closet. Vista tends to have all this stuff already installed, so when you want that esoteric driver or bit of functionality all you need to do is check a box. Downside? The huge install size of the OS.
UAC/Security:
Although alot of people (including Mike) complain about UAC, this was 100% the right move by Microsoft. The computer should warn you when something risky is about to be done – most people who browse the web have no idea what popups and random applications are actually doing, or even when they are installing software. UAC is a very good red flag to let you catch when something possibly bad is about to happen, so you can stop it. Its the same reason *nix systems make you run as root to do certain things – you dont want those things to “just happen”.
In general, the security in Vista is much much better than XP in terms of the codebase (less bugs) as well as the general philosophy of how security should be approached from a Windows OS. Job very well done here. In my opinion this is actually the top reason to use Vista.
Multimedia:
In general, Vista is much more media friendly than XP. I had Ultimate installed, and media center is a very cool app – worthwhile for sure. Also, Vista is much more photo and video friendly, doing much more reasonable default things with them than XP. For example, there is a simple difference between XP and Vista’s slideshow funcitonality, but it is a big difference. Also, MS paint has like 2 new features, which is basically double what it had before.
So that’s about it. In my opinion, these pluses didn’t outweigh the huge negatives I experienced with Vista (application compatibility nightmares, driver issues, windows update breaking, horrible performance). Right now? I’m running XP on all my machines, I have Linux on my desktop, but rarely boot into that.
Filed under: Boring-ass-shit, original, Stuff, tech, Useful Things Tagged: | Aero, Microsoft, UAC, Vista, Windows, XP

[...] Update: Things I actually liked about Windows Vista. [...]
with regards to UAC, it warns you when you do simple shit like changing the name of a file, moving a file, inhaling, exhaling, blinking, etc.
Yeah, but as far as my experience with it went, at least it never asked me whether I was sure I wanted to jerk off or not.
mine did…
Are you sure you’re not confusing Vista with your Catholic sense of shame?
Mike did you add this to Stumbleupon?
yeah
nice.
i added all the mame and tech posts
you make my boner huge.
Did you see my comment about video games live?
yeah, I’m psyched
Thinking of bringing anyone? Ask Alex.
Good points there. Although I personally didn’t care for Aero (I’m spoiled by Compiz) and deactivated it. I always used the classic look in XP anyway, and the added performance/memory is a nice bonus.
I can’t say that I ever had any of the main problems you listed. Where no Vista drivers were available, I installed the XP ones without problems. And very rarely have I come across application compatibility problems on my 64-bit Vista. I’d mention the Cisco VPN client, if that wasn’t a cheap business scam by Cisco to get network admins to buy new stuff from them (for which a 64-bit client is available). Or I’d mention Apple QuickTime, if that wasn’t just due to Apple not giving a **** about 64-bit Windows systems. The best part? Everything works, except that the seek bar does not appear in the browser plugin. They can’t tell me that this would be so hard to fix.
The main problem with Vista is, I think, that it is built for high-end über-machines. I use Vista on a quadcore with 8 GB RAM, and everything is quick as a breeze. I even can have the awesome search indexer supervise my 8 terabyte harddrives and not even notice a slowdown. Vista’s main problem, I think, is that it doesn’t scale down. It almost hurts a little to see them ship it with singlecore notebooks. Vista was not made for machines like that. They promised to improve this for Windows 7, but I think they never should have suggested that Vista replace XP on weaker systems in the first place.